![]() Irrespective of image quality differences, the best cameras are much better for engaging with the photographic process than a little glass slab with a circle icon at the bottom of the screen.Įqually, a smartphone already has the communication capabilities, advanced interface and wireless contract associated with it, which should mean that there's no need pay to duplicate the cellular and GPS hardware, for your camera maker to try to develop an extensive input interface or for anyone to convince large, often intransigent network operators to provide sensibly-priced plans for devices that aren't going to be used for web browsing or phone calls. The experience can be deeply frustrating, as the concept holds so much promise: the idea of being able to use a dedicated camera to take precisely the photo you want and then be able to share or upload it using a smartphone seems obvious. It's been nearly twenty years since Nikon introduced the first Wi-Fi enabled cameras and 16 years since the iPhone helped to ushered in the modern smartphone era, and yet we continue to hear about how unreliable and inconsistent the experience of connecting cameras can be. Why is it so difficult to simply transfer some images to your phone? In part this is because the potentially useful image transfer apps can be awkward or unreliable to use. ![]() Your latest camera probably has Wi-Fi capabilities, yet we know a lot of people say they simply don't use that capability at all. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |